Fags make noise about 377A
Ok seriously… This whole 377A thing is getting out of hand… I mite be subjecting myself to alot of scutiny by writing this post.. but wat the hell.. i like controversy. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/307665/1/.html
I have nothing against gays.. u do ur thing.. n i’ll do mine.. as long as ur not a menace to society, ur personal sexual preferences have nothing to do with me.. 377A is a law that criminalized man on man action.. but seriously.. its not as if ur going to fuck outside a police post rite? Its just like the whole blowjob thing, the law is just there.. but its not as if people are not doing it… its not as if the govt is actively “cracking” down on violaters (pun intended). If they dont want to take it out then just let it be… It will be taken down when the time is right… when society at large is ready.
I’m not for 377A but neither am i against it… i dont really think it matters if they’re not prosecuting people… Its just like the school rules say ur hair cannot touch ur eyebrows… but if no one makes noise about it.. then its just there as a school rule but not enforced.. it doesnt make a diff to the people violating it rite?
on October 25, 2007 on 8:14 pm
Stupid laws must repealed. Even if they are not strictly enforced, they might be used for blackmailing or repressions.
on October 29, 2007 on 8:34 am
‘Fag’ is a hateful word, akin to ‘chink’, ‘nigger’, ‘bitch’ and ‘kling’. Your headline is mean-spirited and disrespectful (not to mention unnecessary, given your attempt in the main article to adopt a ‘neither for nor against’ position – which only makes people wonder, what are you trying so hard to prove by using this word?).
Incidentally, your name (like mine) appears to be South Asian. I find it sad and ironic that you cannot see the danger of using this kind of language, as a member of a minority group yourself.